Choosing the Right AI Assistant for Your Business

Choosing the Right AI Assistant for Your Business

How to Choose the Right AI (LLM) for Your Business (and When to Use More Than One)

First... what is an LLM?

A large language model (LLM) is software that’s been trained on massive amounts of text so it can predict the next word in a sentence—which lets it write, summarize, translate, answer questions, analyze data, and interact with tools. Think of it as an adaptable text engine: you give it instructions (a “prompt”), and it produces a structured response in plain language. Modern LLMs can also handle images, spreadsheets, and PDFs, and they can be tailored to your business with techniques like retrieval (connecting to your documents) and fine-tuning (training on your examples). They’re fast and flexible, but not infallible: they may produce confident mistakes (“hallucinations”) and need guardrails for privacy, accuracy, and compliance. In short, an LLM is a powerful general-purpose assistant that turns your instructions and data into useful work.

Large language models aren’t one-size-fits-all. Each platform has a center of gravity—productivity in your suite, research with live citations, safety and guardrails, or deep customization. The right choice depends on where your work lives, your risk posture, and the outcomes you need this quarter.

The Short List And What Makes Each Different

ChatGPT (OpenAI)
Best for: general versatility, agents/workflows, strong tool ecosystem.
Why businesses pick it: enterprise privacy and admin controls plus broad built-in tools for search, data analysis, files, voice, and images.

Gemini (Google)
Best for: teams on Google Workspace that want AI inside Gmail, Docs, Sheets, and Meet.
Why businesses pick it: native Workspace integration, NotebookLM, and fast-moving reasoning models for complex tasks.

Microsoft Copilot (for Microsoft 365)
Best for: companies standardized on Microsoft 365 that want AI over their Microsoft Graph data.
Why businesses pick it: deep in-app assistance across Outlook, Word, Excel, and Teams, with security and compliance aligned to Microsoft 365.

Claude (Anthropic)
Best for: careful, steerable assistants with strong long-context performance.
Why businesses pick it: team features such as projects and memory, plus skills to standardize outputs like spreadsheets, decks, and docs.

Perplexity (Enterprise)
Best for: research with citations and fast, source-grounded answers.
Why businesses pick it: real-time results, clear sourcing, and optional data integrations.

Cohere (Command / RAG stack)
Best for: enterprises prioritizing private deployments, retrieval-augmented generation, and multilingual coverage.
Why businesses pick it: command, embed, and rerank models, with options for private hosting and secure integration.

Mistral
Best for: teams wanting open-weight options, cost control, and deep customization.
Why businesses pick it: run anywhere from edge to cloud, fine-tuning options, and competitive performance at lower cost.

Meta Llama (open weights)
Best for: engineering teams that need full control on-prem or in a private VPC and want to avoid vendor lock-in.
Why businesses pick it: broad open-weight family, long-context and multimodal variants, and a large community ecosystem.

A Fast Decision Flow

  1. Where does your team already work?
    • Google Workspace: start with Gemini for in-suite drafting, summarizing, and meetings.
    • Microsoft 365: start with Copilot for Outlook, Word, Excel, and Teams.
  2. Is research with citations the core job?
    • Use Perplexity Enterprise for live, sourced answers.
  3. Do you need strong guardrails and consistent deliverables across teams?
    • Use Claude to standardize outputs and preserve context across projects.
  4. Do you plan to build agents and bespoke workflows that touch multiple systems?
    • Use ChatGPT for broad tools and connectors; consider Cohere or Mistral if you want private/VPC or open-weight control.
  5. Do you have regulatory, compliance, or data-residency constraints?
    • Favor vendors with strong enterprise commitments or open-weight options you can host privately.

Capability Snapshot At A Glance

• Productivity-suite native: Gemini for Google Workspace, Copilot for Microsoft 365.
• Research with citations: Perplexity Enterprise.
• Team memory and standardized outputs: Claude.
• Agent and workflow breadth: ChatGPT.
• Private/VPC and RAG focus: Cohere.
• Open-weight control and customization: Mistral, Meta Llama.

When One LLM Isn’t Enough

Most teams end up multi-LLM. Think of this like tools in a belt:
• Suite AI (Gemini or Copilot) to draft, summarize, and automate inside your office apps.
• Perplexity to research with citations and keep everyone honest.
• Claude to standardize deliverables and keep context over time.
• ChatGPT to power agents and automations that touch multiple systems.
• Cohere, Mistral, or Llama to build private, domain-specific models when control or cost predictability matters.

A Practical Evaluation Checklist

Data and security
• Where will prompts and outputs be stored?
• Can we set retention?
• Is customer data used for training?
• Do we need private/VPC or on-prem options?

Fit with our stack
• Are we a Google or Microsoft shop?
• Do we need live, cited research?

Capabilities
• Long-context teamwork and standardized outputs?
• Agents, multimodal, connectors, and file handling?

Governance and adoption
• SSO, auditability, role-based access.
• Content policies and safe defaults.
• Training and enablement for users.

Cost and control
• Per-seat vs consumption.
• Do we benefit from open weights to tune costs and latency?

Suggested Starter Configurations

Google-first company
• Gemini for day-to-day
• Perplexity for research
• Claude for standardized client deliverables

Microsoft-first company
• Copilot for Microsoft 365
• Perplexity for research
• ChatGPT for cross-suite agents and automations

Regulated or controlled environment
• Cohere in private/VPC or Mistral/Llama open weights
• Perplexity in the browser for sourced research with minimal data ingress

Bottom Line

Pick the LLM that meets users where they already work and satisfies your data posture first. Then add a research engine and a consistency model for repeatable deliverables. Most small and midsize teams get the best results from a multi-LLM setup: suite-native AI plus research plus one builder model for automations or private RAG.

Contact Us

Questions or want guidance for your business? Contact us today!